Last Friday the WMSC gave Formula One’s governing body, the FIA, permission to pursue legal action towards the Sunday Times newspaper, seeking libel over an article the paper published in September. The article, written by former Formula One driver and now respected commentator Martin Brundle, spoke about a witch-hunt against McLaren being carried out by the Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile. Today, Brundle has followed up his original piece and offered a rebuttal to the FIA, claiming they are trying to deter the media for speaking against them and accusing the organisation of imposing double standards on their punishment policies.
You can read Brundle’s recent column here: How can Formula One justify blatant double standards?
As a former Formula One driver, I have earnt [sic] the right to have an opinion about the sport, and probably know as much about it as anybody else.
…
I have never been more passionate about F1 and will always share my opinions in an honest and open way, knowing readers will make up their own minds. Martin Brundle.
Brundle goes on to say how conversations between himself and other Formula One luminaries almost always end up on the McLaren/Renault punishment topic, and how the general perception is that the FIA are using double-standards. And in absolute fairness to Martin, that is pretty accurate: most people, I believe, do feel that the FIA have done wrong by punishing McLaren but not Renault.
It is highly unlikely the FIA will actually get anywhere with this writ, but suffice to say I’m sure journalists up and down the pitlane will be choosing their words very carefully in the future. And this, my dear reader, will only dilute the already weak flow of information from the sport.
If a respected former participant of the sport cannot intelligently discuss what just about every fan can see with their own eyes (and let’s not forget, Brundle is also a fan himself), then we are all poorer as a result.
December 9th, 2007 at 1:58pm
I am glad that Brundle is standing up to this attempt at bullying by the FIA. They have been allowed to get away with far too much for far too long and we have been desperate for someone to shrug off their threats and reveal the truth to the world. Go get ‘em, Martin!
December 9th, 2007 at 3:56pm
The FIA are on a path to self-destruction. The case will inevitably reveal weaknesses in the FIA’s approach to the judicial side of its work. Even if The Sunday Times loses the case, the EU will be quite curious as to how those weaknesses are consistent with the FIA’s role as judge, jury and executioner in its cases.
December 10th, 2007 at 11:28am
If Brundle had come out and written something totally outrageous about the FIA then I could understand this, however he basically said not only what everyone else was thinking but he also made it clear (in my mind at least) that this was simply his opinion and he wasn’t stating a fact (even if it is a fact!).
A governing body which hands out punishments will only have any credibility if it is respected and for that reason it is within it’s rights to clamp down on anyone trying to undermine their authority.
However, the FIA and WMSC seem to be undermining their own authority by the decisions they are handing out!
Every case should be judged on it’s own merits, but when dishing out punishments they should be done in accordance with what punishments have been handed out before.