Comments on: Testing: What Would Happen If It Was Outlawed? http://blogf1.co.uk/2008/04/14/testing-what-would-happen-if-it-was-outlawed/ Your Regular Blog and Guide to Formula One Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:33:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Milos http://blogf1.co.uk/2008/04/14/testing-what-would-happen-if-it-was-outlawed/#comment-64954 Milos Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:35:06 +0000 http://blogf1.co.uk/?p=1109#comment-64954 I think in general it is fine as it is and if it ain't broken better don't fix it. but one thing I would like to see back - the 3rd drivers on Fridays ... editing just for the sake of testing this feature :-) I think in general it is fine as it is and if it ain’t broken better don’t fix it. but one thing I would like to see back - the 3rd drivers on Fridays …

editing just for the sake of testing this feature :-)

]]> By: Journeyer http://blogf1.co.uk/2008/04/14/testing-what-would-happen-if-it-was-outlawed/#comment-64953 Journeyer Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:40:06 +0000 http://blogf1.co.uk/?p=1109#comment-64953 Yup, testing seems to be just about right as of now. And I think this balance is leading to better racing as a result. Ever since the testing limit was agreed to by all the teams, the hierarchy of the teams has become tighter and more changeable from race to race. And that can only be a good thing. Yup, testing seems to be just about right as of now. And I think this balance is leading to better racing as a result. Ever since the testing limit was agreed to by all the teams, the hierarchy of the teams has become tighter and more changeable from race to race. And that can only be a good thing.

]]> By: Alianora La Canta http://blogf1.co.uk/2008/04/14/testing-what-would-happen-if-it-was-outlawed/#comment-64947 Alianora La Canta Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:50:10 +0000 http://blogf1.co.uk/?p=1109#comment-64947 I'm OK with testing as it is (apart from the loopholes, which for some reason nobody's abused - yet). Too little testing and teams have to use more expensive methods of finding out how good their developments are, widening the gap between haves and have-nots (admittedly not much of a problem this year). Too much and the hierarchy stagnates, with teams hardly ever changing position. It's a tricky balancing act. I’m OK with testing as it is (apart from the loopholes, which for some reason nobody’s abused - yet). Too little testing and teams have to use more expensive methods of finding out how good their developments are, widening the gap between haves and have-nots (admittedly not much of a problem this year). Too much and the hierarchy stagnates, with teams hardly ever changing position. It’s a tricky balancing act.

]]>