<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mosley Is Still Refraining From Comment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogf1.co.uk/2008/04/01/mosley-is-still-refraining-from-comment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2008/04/01/mosley-is-still-refraining-from-comment/</link>
	<description>Your Regular Blog and Guide to Formula One</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:58:17 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tote F1 Pro</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2008/04/01/mosley-is-still-refraining-from-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-64557</link>
		<dc:creator>Tote F1 Pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogf1.co.uk/?p=1083#comment-64557</guid>
		<description>&quot;From a purely motor racing point of view you can’t have somebody like this running the sport or any other sport come to that.&quot;

What utter rubbish! What he&#039;s &#039;alledgedly&#039; done is in no way illegal, and has, as far as i can see, has harmed nobody. Okay, some may see it as being in bad taste, but that&#039;s their opinion and as far as i can tell has nothing at all to do with his ability to work in F1.

I think he has every right to remain silent. His business is his and his alone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;From a purely motor racing point of view you can’t have somebody like this running the sport or any other sport come to that.&#8221;</p>
<p>What utter rubbish! What he&#8217;s &#8216;alledgedly&#8217; done is in no way illegal, and has, as far as i can see, has harmed nobody. Okay, some may see it as being in bad taste, but that&#8217;s their opinion and as far as i can tell has nothing at all to do with his ability to work in F1.</p>
<p>I think he has every right to remain silent. His business is his and his alone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2008/04/01/mosley-is-still-refraining-from-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-64553</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogf1.co.uk/?p=1083#comment-64553</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know anything much about this whole sadomasocistic stuff so I&#039;m not qualified to comment on what&#039;s &quot;normal&quot; in these cases, but it&#039;s all mighty strange to me!

With allegations like these, if they make it into the press then even if they are later retracted or found to be false, noone remembers the retraction yet everyone remembers the allegations.

This will haunt Max for years, no matter what the outcome is.  A swift denial would have seemed to be the way to go though, so I agree it&#039;s really odd that one hasn&#039;t appeared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know anything much about this whole sadomasocistic stuff so I&#8217;m not qualified to comment on what&#8217;s &#8220;normal&#8221; in these cases, but it&#8217;s all mighty strange to me!</p>
<p>With allegations like these, if they make it into the press then even if they are later retracted or found to be false, noone remembers the retraction yet everyone remembers the allegations.</p>
<p>This will haunt Max for years, no matter what the outcome is.  A swift denial would have seemed to be the way to go though, so I agree it&#8217;s really odd that one hasn&#8217;t appeared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journeyer</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2008/04/01/mosley-is-still-refraining-from-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-64552</link>
		<dc:creator>Journeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 12:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogf1.co.uk/?p=1083#comment-64552</guid>
		<description>Craig, that would just be funny.  We&#039;d get Max all embarrassed, but we wouldn&#039;t be asking for his head.  The Nazi element just seems... wrong.  I mean, there are so many other... environments... you can use for this?  Why the one that&#039;s just... well, wrong?

Assuming it&#039;s Max, it WAS supposed to be his private life, but it got leaked.  Max should have done what he could to avoid it getting leaked, but he did not do enough, and now, he has to pay the consequences.

ASSUMING it&#039;s Max.  Let&#039;s wait for more evidence.  But why no denial, though?  Odd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, that would just be funny.  We&#8217;d get Max all embarrassed, but we wouldn&#8217;t be asking for his head.  The Nazi element just seems&#8230; wrong.  I mean, there are so many other&#8230; environments&#8230; you can use for this?  Why the one that&#8217;s just&#8230; well, wrong?</p>
<p>Assuming it&#8217;s Max, it WAS supposed to be his private life, but it got leaked.  Max should have done what he could to avoid it getting leaked, but he did not do enough, and now, he has to pay the consequences.</p>
<p>ASSUMING it&#8217;s Max.  Let&#8217;s wait for more evidence.  But why no denial, though?  Odd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2008/04/01/mosley-is-still-refraining-from-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-64549</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogf1.co.uk/?p=1083#comment-64549</guid>
		<description>WIthout any further information from any party it&#039;s hard to do anything other than speculate further!

The main thing which seems to have upset people is the fact he was involved in this whole &quot;Nazi&quot; thing.  Is this a vitally important piece of news or simply a biproduct of the type of act he seems to enjoy?  I&#039;d imagine if you are into all this sadomasochistic stuff then you have to have a believable &quot;roleplaying environment&quot; to do it in.  Pretending to be a doctor and nurse probably wouldn&#039;t do it!

Obviously the Nazi element is the driving force behind the newspaper story so it&#039;s understandable that they have placed emphasis on it.

Someone else asked elsewhere if there would have been such a palava had the prostitues been dressed as bunnygirls or something.  I think that&#039;s even more disturbing - if what has taken place shows he would like to get intimate with some Nazis then would bunnygirls show he would like to do the same with rabbits?!

It&#039;s all too weird for words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WIthout any further information from any party it&#8217;s hard to do anything other than speculate further!</p>
<p>The main thing which seems to have upset people is the fact he was involved in this whole &#8220;Nazi&#8221; thing.  Is this a vitally important piece of news or simply a biproduct of the type of act he seems to enjoy?  I&#8217;d imagine if you are into all this sadomasochistic stuff then you have to have a believable &#8220;roleplaying environment&#8221; to do it in.  Pretending to be a doctor and nurse probably wouldn&#8217;t do it!</p>
<p>Obviously the Nazi element is the driving force behind the newspaper story so it&#8217;s understandable that they have placed emphasis on it.</p>
<p>Someone else asked elsewhere if there would have been such a palava had the prostitues been dressed as bunnygirls or something.  I think that&#8217;s even more disturbing &#8211; if what has taken place shows he would like to get intimate with some Nazis then would bunnygirls show he would like to do the same with rabbits?!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all too weird for words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
