<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dave Richards Confirms No Prodrive For 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/11/23/dave-richards-confirms-no-prodrive-for-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/11/23/dave-richards-confirms-no-prodrive-for-2008/</link>
	<description>Your Regular Blog and Guide to Formula One</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:59:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BlogF1 - Your Regular Blog and Guide to Formula One &#187; Official 2008 Entry List Published</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/11/23/dave-richards-confirms-no-prodrive-for-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-62501</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogF1 - Your Regular Blog and Guide to Formula One &#187; Official 2008 Entry List Published</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/11/23/dave-richards-confirms-no-prodrive-for-2008/#comment-62501</guid>
		<description>[...] chassis is deemed legal following the customer car issues. Not on the list are Prodrive, who up until November were still expected to be on the grid. However, like with Aguri, the chassis problems ruled them [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chassis is deemed legal following the customer car issues. Not on the list are Prodrive, who up until November were still expected to be on the grid. However, like with Aguri, the chassis problems ruled them [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craigblog.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/11/23/dave-richards-confirms-no-prodrive-for-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-56389</link>
		<dc:creator>craigblog.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/11/23/dave-richards-confirms-no-prodrive-for-2008/#comment-56389</guid>
		<description>[...] but the problems don&#8217;t end there - Prodrive who are officially allowed to enter next year simply are not able to do so as the rules are in a state of flux.  Until all the &#8220;customer cars&#8221; stuff is sorted out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but the problems don&#8217;t end there &#8211; Prodrive who are officially allowed to enter next year simply are not able to do so as the rules are in a state of flux.  Until all the &#8220;customer cars&#8221; stuff is sorted out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alianora La Canta</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/11/23/dave-richards-confirms-no-prodrive-for-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-50182</link>
		<dc:creator>Alianora La Canta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/11/23/dave-richards-confirms-no-prodrive-for-2008/#comment-50182</guid>
		<description>It seems a bit odd that Prodrive not being on the grid for a whole year is acceptable, but them missing a few races is not. This sounds like a case of the rules being more important than common sense - but then we&#039;ve established that already. Even as someone against the idea of customer cars, the FIA&#039;s handling of the matter seems crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems a bit odd that Prodrive not being on the grid for a whole year is acceptable, but them missing a few races is not. This sounds like a case of the rules being more important than common sense &#8211; but then we&#8217;ve established that already. Even as someone against the idea of customer cars, the FIA&#8217;s handling of the matter seems crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/11/23/dave-richards-confirms-no-prodrive-for-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-50104</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/11/23/dave-richards-confirms-no-prodrive-for-2008/#comment-50104</guid>
		<description>This is a real shame - with the loss of traction control and other bits and bobs next year, there was a chance that Prodrive would start on a more even footing than they would otherwise (at least in the electronics area)  but by delaying things for a year it means they will be a year behind on that too.

It&#039;s also a shame not to be up to a full compliment of 24 drivers for the coming season as at the moment there appears to be more drivers than cars available and some of the drivers are too good not to be racing next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a real shame &#8211; with the loss of traction control and other bits and bobs next year, there was a chance that Prodrive would start on a more even footing than they would otherwise (at least in the electronics area)  but by delaying things for a year it means they will be a year behind on that too.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also a shame not to be up to a full compliment of 24 drivers for the coming season as at the moment there appears to be more drivers than cars available and some of the drivers are too good not to be racing next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
