<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McLaren Under Investigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/05/28/mclaren-under-investigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/05/28/mclaren-under-investigation/</link>
	<description>Your Regular Blog and Guide to Formula One</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:58:17 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: craigblog.co.uk &#187; Monaco Grand Prix - McLaren in the dock</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/05/28/mclaren-under-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-11682</link>
		<dc:creator>craigblog.co.uk &#187; Monaco Grand Prix - McLaren in the dock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 22:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/05/28/mclaren-under-investigation/#comment-11682</guid>
		<description>[...] are numerous F1 websites around and I have yet to see one which supports the view that McLaren acted in an inappropriate way [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are numerous F1 websites around and I have yet to see one which supports the view that McLaren acted in an inappropriate way [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/05/28/mclaren-under-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-11672</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 19:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/05/28/mclaren-under-investigation/#comment-11672</guid>
		<description>100% with you on this... I hadn&#039;t stopped to think that this was probably a result of the hamilton hype machine throwing a tantrum.

Im beginning to have a problem with Hamilton, and ironically its got very little to do with the guy himself, he seems pleasant when interviewed, races well and has generally behaved himself. Unfortunately, the constant stream of hype, not to mention the atrocious way in which ITV coverage has lost all sense of balance (I, for one, am sick of Brundle &amp; co demanding that whichever driver is on screen is ousted so that they can bask in some more hamilton glory) has left me all but wanting him to throw it in the barriers to simply shut people up!

Now, we&#039;re seeing the scales tipped so far as to have the FIA investigate maclaren simply because they issued standard &quot;hold station&quot; orders and/or had the audacity to choose pit strategies that meant Alonso: the driver who qualified fastest, put in the fastest race lap, made no glaring mistakes and in general did everything necessary to earn the win, actually did so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% with you on this&#8230; I hadn&#8217;t stopped to think that this was probably a result of the hamilton hype machine throwing a tantrum.</p>
<p>Im beginning to have a problem with Hamilton, and ironically its got very little to do with the guy himself, he seems pleasant when interviewed, races well and has generally behaved himself. Unfortunately, the constant stream of hype, not to mention the atrocious way in which ITV coverage has lost all sense of balance (I, for one, am sick of Brundle &amp; co demanding that whichever driver is on screen is ousted so that they can bask in some more hamilton glory) has left me all but wanting him to throw it in the barriers to simply shut people up!</p>
<p>Now, we&#8217;re seeing the scales tipped so far as to have the FIA investigate maclaren simply because they issued standard &#8220;hold station&#8221; orders and/or had the audacity to choose pit strategies that meant Alonso: the driver who qualified fastest, put in the fastest race lap, made no glaring mistakes and in general did everything necessary to earn the win, actually did so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctorvee &#187; A history lesson for the MSM and the FIA</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/05/28/mclaren-under-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-11664</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee &#187; A history lesson for the MSM and the FIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 15:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/05/28/mclaren-under-investigation/#comment-11664</guid>
		<description>[...] BlogF1: McLaren Under Investigation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BlogF1: McLaren Under Investigation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver White</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/05/28/mclaren-under-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-11640</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 11:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/05/28/mclaren-under-investigation/#comment-11640</guid>
		<description>The one thing that keeps bothering me about all this was the start.  Lewis didn&#039;t even attempt to creep up on Alonso, but instead he immediately darted right to cover him.

It was almost as though they were told to cover the start and not throw the race away into turn one. (Fair enough, I s&#039;pose)  Then do a few laps so the team can decide who is faster, and then that person will be allowed to go on and win.  A bit like Australia 1998 when Hakkinen and Coulthard had their agreement: &#039;The one to the first corner first gets the win&#039;.

I have no issue with drivers backing down after the final round of stops.  It would have been exciting if Massa could have challenged more and forced the McLaren&#039;s into pushing constantly to the chequered flag, but the Ferrari just wasn&#039;t up to it.  But I do have a problem with deciding the outcome of race based on the given lap times set in the first or second stint.

I just can&#039;t get that start out of my head, especially after we saw Hamilton nab a few places into turn one in previous races, including Fernando on occasion.

@sidepodcast: Yeah, the British media is pretty immature.  It&#039;s a great shame really, but it&#039;s probably the same the world over.  I also see a little immaturity in Hamilton.  But I don&#039;t see petulance yet, just an ego that is growing &lt;em&gt;way&lt;/em&gt; too quickly.

@Ankit: It would have been great if Raikkonen had qualified better, I think the McLaren&#039;s may have been pressured more had that happened and they probably wouldn&#039;t have backed off so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one thing that keeps bothering me about all this was the start.  Lewis didn&#8217;t even attempt to creep up on Alonso, but instead he immediately darted right to cover him.</p>
<p>It was almost as though they were told to cover the start and not throw the race away into turn one. (Fair enough, I s&#8217;pose)  Then do a few laps so the team can decide who is faster, and then that person will be allowed to go on and win.  A bit like Australia 1998 when Hakkinen and Coulthard had their agreement: &#8216;The one to the first corner first gets the win&#8217;.</p>
<p>I have no issue with drivers backing down after the final round of stops.  It would have been exciting if Massa could have challenged more and forced the McLaren&#8217;s into pushing constantly to the chequered flag, but the Ferrari just wasn&#8217;t up to it.  But I do have a problem with deciding the outcome of race based on the given lap times set in the first or second stint.</p>
<p>I just can&#8217;t get that start out of my head, especially after we saw Hamilton nab a few places into turn one in previous races, including Fernando on occasion.</p>
<p>@sidepodcast: Yeah, the British media is pretty immature.  It&#8217;s a great shame really, but it&#8217;s probably the same the world over.  I also see a little immaturity in Hamilton.  But I don&#8217;t see petulance yet, just an ego that is growing <em>way</em> too quickly.</p>
<p>@Ankit: It would have been great if Raikkonen had qualified better, I think the McLaren&#8217;s may have been pressured more had that happened and they probably wouldn&#8217;t have backed off so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankit</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/05/28/mclaren-under-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-11603</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 03:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/05/28/mclaren-under-investigation/#comment-11603</guid>
		<description>I am a third party to this, but wasnt the pushback obvious. 

I mean one lap they are racing tail to head ,and the next lap they slow down by over 2 seconds and no longer challenge each other. 

I agree that this must happen all the time, but the fact is that only 2 cars were in contention for the top two places at Monaco, and to see them not race with each other was a letdown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a third party to this, but wasnt the pushback obvious. </p>
<p>I mean one lap they are racing tail to head ,and the next lap they slow down by over 2 seconds and no longer challenge each other. </p>
<p>I agree that this must happen all the time, but the fact is that only 2 cars were in contention for the top two places at Monaco, and to see them not race with each other was a letdown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidepodcast.com</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/05/28/mclaren-under-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-11582</link>
		<dc:creator>sidepodcast.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 21:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/05/28/mclaren-under-investigation/#comment-11582</guid>
		<description>seems like it&#039;s all hamilton&#039;s fault to me.  he has next to no experience in press conferences and each week he says more and more dangerous things.

this weeks &#039;i had more laps, but they wouldn&#039;t let me race&#039;, is but one of many gaffs.

as for the british media...ahh, forget it. what&#039;s the point?  they&#039;re all waste of space. Kevin Garside is the worst.  but i hate them all equally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seems like it&#8217;s all hamilton&#8217;s fault to me.  he has next to no experience in press conferences and each week he says more and more dangerous things.</p>
<p>this weeks &#8216;i had more laps, but they wouldn&#8217;t let me race&#8217;, is but one of many gaffs.</p>
<p>as for the british media&#8230;ahh, forget it. what&#8217;s the point?  they&#8217;re all waste of space. Kevin Garside is the worst.  but i hate them all equally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver White</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/05/28/mclaren-under-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-11560</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 16:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/05/28/mclaren-under-investigation/#comment-11560</guid>
		<description>To answer my own question: Of course the investigation would not have happened, the FIA are playing to the whims of the British tabloid column-fillers. Crikey, next we&#039;ll be &lt;a href=&quot;http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/05/22/itv-f1-wins-bafta-f1-fans-leave-country/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;seeing ITV getting awards&lt;/a&gt; for their broadcast of Button&#039;s win in Hungary, when they did nothing different to all the other Grand Prix broadcasts. Oh, wait, er...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer my own question: Of course the investigation would not have happened, the FIA are playing to the whims of the British tabloid column-fillers. Crikey, next we&#8217;ll be <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/05/22/itv-f1-wins-bafta-f1-fans-leave-country/" rel="nofollow">seeing ITV getting awards</a> for their broadcast of Button&#8217;s win in Hungary, when they did nothing different to all the other Grand Prix broadcasts. Oh, wait, er&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
