<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Ferrari Replace Kimi&#8217;s Engine?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/04/03/should-ferrari-replace-kimis-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/04/03/should-ferrari-replace-kimis-engine/</link>
	<description>Your Regular Blog and Guide to Formula One</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:58:17 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alianora La Canta</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/04/03/should-ferrari-replace-kimis-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-5735</link>
		<dc:creator>Alianora La Canta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogf1.co.uk/2007/04/03/should-ferrari-replace-kimis-engine/#comment-5735</guid>
		<description>Personally, I would check the engine very, very carefully. If there was a reasonable chance of it finishing Sepang, I would have it run the whole GP, even if this necessitated a few tenths&#039; worth of extra cooling. Kimi can get on the podium with a car slightly slower than usual, but if the engine type won&#039;t make a cool-hot race combo, it certainly won&#039;t make a hot-hot race combination. Getting the engine to work correctly in race conditions surely has to be Ferrari&#039;s top technical priority right now.

If the data showed that Kimi&#039;s engine was very likely to blow during the Malaysian GP weekend, then I would change the engine at the end of Saturday practise at the latest. It simply isn&#039;t worth the risk that Kimi lose the unit in qualifying and be sent to the back of the grid (whereupon a P4 or P5 would be very likely) or explode in the race.

Either way, Ferrari will need to check the data very, very carefully. The wrong decision either way could be costly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I would check the engine very, very carefully. If there was a reasonable chance of it finishing Sepang, I would have it run the whole GP, even if this necessitated a few tenths&#8217; worth of extra cooling. Kimi can get on the podium with a car slightly slower than usual, but if the engine type won&#8217;t make a cool-hot race combo, it certainly won&#8217;t make a hot-hot race combination. Getting the engine to work correctly in race conditions surely has to be Ferrari&#8217;s top technical priority right now.</p>
<p>If the data showed that Kimi&#8217;s engine was very likely to blow during the Malaysian GP weekend, then I would change the engine at the end of Saturday practise at the latest. It simply isn&#8217;t worth the risk that Kimi lose the unit in qualifying and be sent to the back of the grid (whereupon a P4 or P5 would be very likely) or explode in the race.</p>
<p>Either way, Ferrari will need to check the data very, very carefully. The wrong decision either way could be costly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
