<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bonneville 400: So Close!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogf1.co.uk/2006/07/20/bonneville-400-so-close/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2006/07/20/bonneville-400-so-close/</link>
	<description>Your Regular Blog and Guide to Formula One</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: UnGozer</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2006/07/20/bonneville-400-so-close/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>UnGozer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogf1.co.uk/2006/07/20/bonneville-400-so-close/#comment-481</guid>
		<description>They explain their choice for a fin on their web site (www.bonneville400.com/) and also mention rudder is fixed for the record attempt, since that would make it an illigal feature on a F1 car..

I thought it was nice to see that they run a (obviously faster) F1 car in North America for this record (attempt), while they supply the engines for the Indy series. This brings up the current conflict in F1: Do you want  more competitive racing or cutting-edge technological advancement? In my view FIA needs to find a (difficult) balance without killing what makes this sport _the_ absolute top in car racing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They explain their choice for a fin on their web site (www.bonneville400.com/) and also mention rudder is fixed for the record attempt, since that would make it an illigal feature on a F1 car..</p>
<p>I thought it was nice to see that they run a (obviously faster) F1 car in North America for this record (attempt), while they supply the engines for the Indy series. This brings up the current conflict in F1: Do you want  more competitive racing or cutting-edge technological advancement? In my view FIA needs to find a (difficult) balance without killing what makes this sport _the_ absolute top in car racing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver White</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2006/07/20/bonneville-400-so-close/#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogf1.co.uk/2006/07/20/bonneville-400-so-close/#comment-480</guid>
		<description>No, you're right it has no rear wing.  That thing sticking up is a fly-by-wire rudder.  All the rear wing on an F1 car does is glue the rear wheels to the ground.  It actually slows the car down in a straight line, but it does provide grip for the drive wheels and stability.
As far as I can see, this isn't too far away from a standard 2005 car in Monza trim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you&#8217;re right it has no rear wing.  That thing sticking up is a fly-by-wire rudder.  All the rear wing on an F1 car does is glue the rear wheels to the ground.  It actually slows the car down in a straight line, but it does provide grip for the drive wheels and stability.<br />
As far as I can see, this isn&#8217;t too far away from a standard 2005 car in Monza trim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2006/07/20/bonneville-400-so-close/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogf1.co.uk/2006/07/20/bonneville-400-so-close/#comment-479</guid>
		<description>technically it may be race 'legal'.  but, as any one can see - it doesn't have a back wing.  so what's the point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>technically it may be race &#8216;legal&#8217;.  but, as any one can see - it doesn&#8217;t have a back wing.  so what&#8217;s the point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
