<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Suzuka vs. Fuji</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogf1.co.uk/2006/03/15/suzuka-vs-fuji/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2006/03/15/suzuka-vs-fuji/</link>
	<description>Your Regular Blog and Guide to Formula One</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Value Of A Decent Racing Circuit Is Lost On Ecclestone &#187; BlogF1</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2006/03/15/suzuka-vs-fuji/#comment-66428</link>
		<dc:creator>The Value Of A Decent Racing Circuit Is Lost On Ecclestone &#187; BlogF1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogf1.co.uk/2006/03/15/suzuka-vs-fuji/#comment-66428</guid>
		<description>[...] they can boast decent toilet facilities. Yes, I&#8217;m afraid that once again I most bemoan the changing of the Japanese Grand Prix venue from Honda-owned Suzuka to Toyota-owned Fuji. The reason? The circuit has received a lawsuit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they can boast decent toilet facilities. Yes, I&#8217;m afraid that once again I most bemoan the changing of the Japanese Grand Prix venue from Honda-owned Suzuka to Toyota-owned Fuji. The reason? The circuit has received a lawsuit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogF1 - A Formula One Dedicated Blog &#187; F1 2007 Calendar</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2006/03/15/suzuka-vs-fuji/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogF1 - A Formula One Dedicated Blog &#187; F1 2007 Calendar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogf1.co.uk/2006/03/15/suzuka-vs-fuji/#comment-540</guid>
		<description>[...] The FIA have announced the 2007 Formula One calendar, and this one is certainly going to cause some controversy. We have nkown for a while that Suzuka was being replaced with Fuji, but I think having it announced like this is just the confirmation I have been not looking forward to. Suzuka is not featured on the calendar anywhere and personally, I find that to be a disgrace. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The FIA have announced the 2007 Formula One calendar, and this one is certainly going to cause some controversy. We have nkown for a while that Suzuka was being replaced with Fuji, but I think having it announced like this is just the confirmation I have been not looking forward to. Suzuka is not featured on the calendar anywhere and personally, I find that to be a disgrace. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neeraj</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2006/03/15/suzuka-vs-fuji/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Neeraj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogf1.co.uk/2006/03/15/suzuka-vs-fuji/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Well, they have been throwing "quiet some more" dollars at their car and the result was for all to see last weekend.

Suzuka is undoubtly one of the best circuits to race, since I have not seen Fuji in action I really can't comment on that. But going from what you all are saying, it indeed looks like the financial issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, they have been throwing &#8220;quiet some more&#8221; dollars at their car and the result was for all to see last weekend.</p>
<p>Suzuka is undoubtly one of the best circuits to race, since I have not seen Fuji in action I really can&#8217;t comment on that. But going from what you all are saying, it indeed looks like the financial issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver White</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2006/03/15/suzuka-vs-fuji/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogf1.co.uk/2006/03/15/suzuka-vs-fuji/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Maybe Suzuka was lower on the survey, I didn't check that fact (naughty me :( ) but your point was well put K, it does make a mockery of the FIA and their survey.

Ankit, I agree.  It does seem to shout, "Who has more money gets the race."  Maybe Toyota should throw some more dollars at their car instead!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Suzuka was lower on the survey, I didn&#8217;t check that fact (naughty me <img src='http://blogf1.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> ) but your point was well put K, it does make a mockery of the FIA and their survey.</p>
<p>Ankit, I agree.  It does seem to shout, &#8220;Who has more money gets the race.&#8221;  Maybe Toyota should throw some more dollars at their car instead!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankit Sud</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2006/03/15/suzuka-vs-fuji/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankit Sud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogf1.co.uk/2006/03/15/suzuka-vs-fuji/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>I feel that FIA 's sole motive has become just to earn money. they are willing to forget tradition of just a few more bucks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that FIA &#8217;s sole motive has become just to earn money. they are willing to forget tradition of just a few more bucks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2006/03/15/suzuka-vs-fuji/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogf1.co.uk/2006/03/15/suzuka-vs-fuji/#comment-90</guid>
		<description>From comparing layouts of the two and experience of them from computer games (the new Fuji is on Gran Turismo 4) Suzuka looks by far the more challenging and imaginative track.

It has, it has often been said, 'every type of corner on one track'. A hairpinm chicane, fast esses, uphill and downhill corner, favourable and unfavourable cambers - it's even got a crossover.

What does Fuji have? A big straight and a lot of tight corners. It looks completely undramatic - F1 cars would look slow on the Fuji layout, especially on television.

The Japanese Grand Prix really should stay at Suzuka. It reflects very poorly on Toyota that they aparently want to move the race to such a dismal venue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From comparing layouts of the two and experience of them from computer games (the new Fuji is on Gran Turismo 4) Suzuka looks by far the more challenging and imaginative track.</p>
<p>It has, it has often been said, &#8216;every type of corner on one track&#8217;. A hairpinm chicane, fast esses, uphill and downhill corner, favourable and unfavourable cambers - it&#8217;s even got a crossover.</p>
<p>What does Fuji have? A big straight and a lot of tight corners. It looks completely undramatic - F1 cars would look slow on the Fuji layout, especially on television.</p>
<p>The Japanese Grand Prix really should stay at Suzuka. It reflects very poorly on Toyota that they aparently want to move the race to such a dismal venue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://blogf1.co.uk/2006/03/15/suzuka-vs-fuji/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 01:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogf1.co.uk/2006/03/15/suzuka-vs-fuji/#comment-89</guid>
		<description>was suzuka really only second to spa in the survey?  i thought it was lower than that.  it does make a mockery of the survey though.  they ask for an opinion and then go in completely the opposite direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>was suzuka really only second to spa in the survey?  i thought it was lower than that.  it does make a mockery of the survey though.  they ask for an opinion and then go in completely the opposite direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
